You won’t believe what is actually happening… 5g technology & the internet of things is being deployed worldwide over the objections of many scientists & specialists providing decades of studies showing it’s a weapons system that disrupts, destroys & mutates all biology at the cellular level.
Nanotechnology & it’s relationship to the new range of frequencies slated for the millimeter band to be used with 5g spans a wide spectrum above 24 GHz. Currently, the bands 600 MHz, 700 MHz, 800 MHz, 900 MHz, 1.5 GHz, 2.1 GHz, 2.3 GHz and 2.6 GHz are in use for cellular & wireless frequencies which have been shown to cause severe neurological damage to a growing number of the population which is increasing through prolonged exposure & being subjected to highly saturated areas of these pulsed frequencies.
Some of those harmful effects include:
• Widespread neuropsychiatric effects (including depression)
• Lymphoma (& other cancers)
• Genetic alteration & Mutation (genotoxic)
• Neurological damage
• Cataracts & loss of sight
• Dementia / Alzheimer’s Disease
US Navy report from 1972 documents the connection of 122 biological effects with microwaves.
The 5G frequency band is also used for crowd dispersal guns called Active Denial Systems. 5G can see through walls, it can see through your clothes and can see if you’re carrying a weapon. Igan says it could be used to target you with a millimeter-band wave and disable you in your house while the police arrive. The potential for abuse of this system is hair-raising.
Dr. Devra Lee Davis is one of the leading voices against the 5G roll-out. She asserts that the frequencies to be used haven’t been tested for safety. Prior to his departure from the FCC, Tom Wheeler was very forceful in his opinion that no time should be wasted on any such testing, so that the US could be first in a market which he said was going to create billions and billions of dollars in new wealth.
Davis is very highly-credentialed physician, as the Founding Director of the Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology of the US National Research Council, National Academy of Sciences, Founding Director of the Center for Environmental Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute. She’s taught at numerous top-level universities and has had articles published in the Lancet, Journal of the American Medical Association to Scientific American and the New York Times. She has said:
“Israeli research studies presented at an international conference reveal that [5G uses] the same electromagnetic frequencies used for crowd control weapons…[the 5G network] will tie together more than 50 billion devices as part of the Internet of Things…Verizon just announced that 5G networks will be tested in 11 U.S. cities. 5G Networks will involve the deployment of millions of antennas nationwide, thousands in each city, because millimeter waves cannot easily travel through buildings or other obstacles. Proposed installations have led to public outcry in residential areas where homeowners do not want antennas mounted at their yards or near schools.”
Bioacoustics is a technology that has been around for about 20 years that AT&T is itching to deploy which uses your unique skeletal structure and hand gestures to let you open your house and office doors and to basically act as you unique identifier and login “password” for all sorts of things.
The problem with this system is that like all digital systems, it can be hacked – but in this case, the thing that could be hacked is your skeletal structure! The neurological effects are unknown & politicians like Democrat Tom Wheeler, former Chairman of the Federal Communications Commission, says the potential for billions of dollars in profit to US telecom corporations justifies rolling out 5G technology without testing or even discussing the possibility that it could cause psychological disorders and cancer. He really says that – and much more you will not like. Prior to being appointed by President Obama, Wheeler worked as a venture capitalist and lobbyist for the cable and wireless industry, holding positions including president of the National Cable & Telecommunications Association and CEO of the Cellular Telecommunications & Internet Association. As is customary for FCC chairmen, he resigned when President Trump’s administration began.
Smart Phones Will Send Data THROUGH YOUR BONES Next
The Specific Absorption Rating System (SAR) provided by telecom manufacturers about the known biological effects of absorption measured in W/Kg not power of RF (Radio Frequencies). Homogenizing their assumption does not necessarily fit the average human since a 6 foot tall person with a 11 pound head such as industry uses differs dramatically from that of an infant. Because SAR measures absorption over 1 gram of tissue (or 10 grams in Europe), this may effectively average out hot spots. Additionally, because of the pulsed nature of the signals, the average power can remain low whereas the individual bursts are very high.
The other flaw in the SAR standard is its focus on thermal effects only. For more information on non-thermal effects, read the Science Overview. With respect to call duration, Robert C. Kane notes that most of the temperature rise due to the energy absorption occurs in the first 60-90 seconds of exposure. Hence, if energy absorption were the major concern, then a short call would have to be defined as being less than a minute (Kane, 12).
For mobile phones, the SAR limit is 1.6 W/kg for the general public, for the partial body limit. This standard is based on behavioral disturbances observed in monkeys at 4 W/kg. The guidelines followed are based on MPE or Maximum Permissible Exposure combined with specific absorption rate (SAR) set at 4W/Kg
According to OSHA 1910.97(a)(2)(i) states:
For normal environmental conditions and for incident electromagnetic energy of frequencies from 10 MHz to 100 GHz, the radiation protection guide is 10 mW/cm2 (milliwatt per square centimeter) as averaged over any possible 0.1-hour period. (6 minutes)
Anything beyond this limit is not taken in consideration to meet the standard. This is totally insane given what we know; a unacceptable level of deception and treachery is standing in the way of sensible standards by a predatory industry that has captured the regulatory agencies by their snake-oil salesmen – the lobbyists.
SAR values have been created based on simulations of exposure in a plexiglass head filled with fluid, not a human head, and many scientists consider them to be inaccurate and irrelevant at determining actual biological effects.
“It is important consumers realize that the SAR value, while providing information for comparison purposes between phones, is very limited in its usefulness as a measure of ‘safety.’ We are greatly concerned that people may be turning to the EWG database in droves not understanding just how limited a measure the SAR value is.”— Camilla Rees, Magda Havas, PhD
The District Court for the Western District of Washington, however,
held to the contrary:
[t]here is nothing to suggest that Congress, by requiring action
“within a reasonable period of time,” intended to force local
government procedures onto a rigid timetable where the circumstances call for study, deliberation and decision-making
among competing applicants. The City is seeking to determine,
among other things, whether tall antenna towers are still necessary for the purpose at hand. It is entitled to find that out. The
“generally applicable time frames” for zoning decisions, in
Washington, may include reasonable moratoria adopted in
compliance with state law. To hold otherwise would afford telecommunications applicants the “preferential treatment” that
Congress sought to avoid. Medina’s moratorium, coupled with
its ongoing investigation and its processing of applications, is
consistent with this part of the [Act].
The Commission issued a Second Memorandum Opinion and Order on August 25, 1997 to address petitions regarding the adoption of new exposure limits. OET has revised OST Bulletin No. 65, to provide guidance on acceptable methods of determining compliance with the Commission’s new exposure limits. The revised bulletin, OET Bulletin 65, Evaluating Compliance With FCC Guidelines for Human Exposure to Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields was issued simultaneously with the release of the Second MO&O.
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), however, has noted data showing evidence for biological effects at a SAR of 1W/kg, indicating that our current standard is not protective enough. Other independent scientists have found evidence of harmful effects at even lower SAR’s. For example, harmful effects are seen in rat brains after only 2 hours at 0.2 W/kg. To give you an idea of how high 1.6 W/kg is, note that the SAR can already reach 0.001 W/kg at 150-200 meters from a mobile phone mast (cell tower), and health effects have been observed up to 300-400 meters (over 1300 feet) or more from a cell tower. See Table of Effects by Power.
From 1 to 18 mW/m2 tests determined decreased life span, impaired reproduction, structural and developmental abnormalities in duckweed plants. (Magone 1996)
At 1.68 – 10.53 mW/m2 demonstrated irreversible infertility in male mice after 5 generations of exposure to RFR from “antenna park” Magras & Xenos, 1997 (Sage, Lai) With 1.3 mW/m2 decreased cell growth was observed. (Kwee 1997) This is not conducive to life, in fact it is the antithesis to healthy biological functions.
Most of the world has adopted a limit around 10 μW/m2 which happens to be the threshold of whole body microwave irradiation tested on mice, as well as having a significant effect on the immune system and irradiation (5 hours) with low-power microwaves which stimulates the immune potential of macrophages and T cells. Furthermore, at 10 μW/m2 headache, dizziness, irritability, fatigue, weakness, insomnia, chest pain, difficulty breathing, indigestion (humans—occupational exposure) is established. Experiments during the cold war revealed chronic irradiation of American Embassy personnel in Moscow of 600 MHz to 9.5 GHz resulted in increased risk of leukemia and uterine cancer.  Then on September 5 2018 PubMed published a paper outlining brain trauma & other neurological symptoms suffered by U.S. and Canadian diplomats to Cuba (and now China) The point being, whether tests were performed in a controlled environment or as a clandestine military operation such as Project Bizarre, the harmful effects are well established and understood.
So how did the US and Canada arrive at such a high limit?
According to the FCC the guidelines & limits are determined as follows:
The FCC guidelines for human exposure to RF electromagnetic fields were derived from the recommendations of two expert organizations, the National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (NCRP) and the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE). Both the NCRP exposure criteria and the IEEE standard were developed by expert scientists and engineers after extensive reviews of the scientific literature related to RF biological effects. The exposure guidelines are based on thresholds for known adverse effects, and they incorporate prudent margins of safety. In adopting the current RF exposure guidelines, the FCC consulted with the EPA, FDA, OSHA and NIOSH, and obtained their support for the guidelines that the FCC is using.
The FCC goes on to state that:
Many countries in Europe and elsewhere use exposure guidelines developed by the International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP). The ICNIRP safety limits are generally similar to those of the NCRP and IEEE, with a few exceptions. For example, ICNIRP recommends somewhat different exposure levels in the lower and upper frequency ranges and for localized exposure due to such devices as hand-held cellular telephones. One of the goals of the WHO EMF Project (see above) is to provide a framework for international harmonization of RF safety standards.source: RF Safety FAQ
Within the OSHA Radiation Protection Guide we find this:
Radiation protection guide. Radiation level which should not be exceeded without careful consideration of the reasons for doing so.
What kind of brain-power does it require to see this as nothing more than a gaping loophole for manufacturers & carriers to exploit.
The power, or heating effect, of the phone is only one of many possible factors impacting cell phone ‘safety.’ Exposures to the radiation from the cell phone at non-heating levels have been linked to many serious biological effects, and the SAR value is not capturing anything about these harmful non-thermal exposures.
The SAR value varies with the source of exposure and the person using the phone. For example, if you are in a rural area or in an elevator or a car, where the cell phone uses more power, your brain will get a greater exposure from the higher power required in these instances. Under certain conditions, the SAR value can be 10-100 times higher than reported.
In the U.S. and Canada, the SAR limit for mobile devices used by the public is 1.6 W/kg per 1 gram of head tissue. To understand why and how SAR underestimates radiation absorption and health risks, see “Exposure Limits: The Underestimation of Absorbed Cellphone Radiation, Especially in Children,”3,4 published in the journal Electromagnetic Biology and Medicine in 2012.
FCC & FRC Reported Cases, 1928 – 2010
February 1, 2010 – (1896 reported cases) “*” Indicates 320 cases decided without published opinions on the health & safety effects of wireless radiation.
Perhaps another more important consideration is how frequently a phone is sending signals when one is not actively on a call. Many smart phones (e.g., iPhone, Blackbery, Android), depending upon one’s service subscriptions and configured options, may be constantly “connected”, continually “polling” the network for new e-mails or instant messages. Hence, just leaving a smart phone with internet/data mode enabled can constitute heavy usage.
Old-fashioned phones tend not to be constantly “connected” when one is not on a call, and may send a “hello” signal on the order of once an hour or once every half-hour. In contrast, some smart phones are sending signals at least once a minute or every few minutes, even when one is not on a call.
Any questions on the Commission’s policies with respect to radio frequency electromagnetic fields should be addressed to:
RF Safety Program
Federal Communications Commission
Office of Engineering and Techology
445 12th Street, SW
Washington, DC 20554
- FCC Adopts Rules to Facilitate Next Generation Wireless Technologies
- FCC Chair: Corporate Profit More Important Than Health, Safety
- FCC: INTIMIDATING PRESS, SUPPRESSING SCIENCE AT ‘5G’ ANNOUNCEMENT
- Environmental Health Trust
- AT&T Will Transfer Data Through Your Bones
- SAR – The Specific Absorption Rating Standard | FAQ
- Brain trauma suffered by U.S. diplomats abroad could be work of hostile foreign government
- Project Bizarre Weapons Implications: Are Psychiatric Diagnosis, and Microwave Exposure Standards Presumptive?
- Health Effects Seen In US Embassy Employees Exposed To Microwaves During The Cold War & Havana Cuba: A Connection?
- Illegal Levels of Radiation Emitted by Popular Cellphones
- OSHA Radiofrequency and Microwave Radiation
- THE TELECOMMUNICATIONS ACT OF 1996: (pdf)
Learn more about 5g on the De-Program Network Brain