LAST UPDATED June 15 2022
OSHA SAYS MASKS DON’T WORK — AND VIOLATE OSHA OXYGEN LEVELS
NO GOVERNOR CAN ORDER YOU TO WEAR A MASK
”There is no scientific evidence that masks are effective. If you are not sick, you should not wear a face mask.”— Dr. Russell Blaylock
DE-PROGRAM NOTE: If you are sick, the last thing you need is restricted airflow higher CO2 concentration and lowered oxygen levels.
#SHOW ME THE LAW! — NO GOVERNOR CAN MAKE LAW | The Healthy American, Peggy Hall
Yet worse, in practice, the N95 mask has been found to be ineffective in preventing the transmission of viruses: a review of six clinical studies, published in the Canadian Medical Association Journal, found that medical workers caught viruses from their patients just as often when they used N95 respirators as when they used ordinary medical masks.
None of the 17 studies established a conclusive relationship between mask/respirator use and protection against influenza infection.— Harvard School of Public Health
Given that the CDC and the World Health Organization have concluded this month that mask-wearing is completely ineffective at preventing the spread of viral infections including COVID-19, and further given the absolute wealth of medical studies concluding that mask-wearing creates dangerously low levels of oxygen combined with high rates of carbon dioxide and other toxic gases which can, in turn, lead to headache and loss of consciousness as well as precipitate respiratory and cardiac events which can prove fatal – and indeed, in recent weeks, have led to drivers losing consciousness and T-boning trees and two children suffering fatal heart attacks while trying to exercise while mask-wearing in China – the suggestion by County Health Officers that all residents wear masks while outside their homes will not only fail abysmally in achieving any purported health goal, it will further serve to put millions of residents at risk of severe injury and/or death. To put a very fine point on it: mandatory face covering orders puts directly into harm’s way at least 56% of residents who have chronic, underlying health conditions. More than most, this half of the population needs its normal oxygen intake just to survive.
Surgical masks worn in hospitals are not to be confused with, nor compared to, masks worn by the general population. Hospitals are sanitized environments, temperature controlled to 70 degrees with positive airflow, and surgical masks are changed frequently. However, this is not what is happening in society with mandatory mask orders. Researchers have found that masks (cloth and N95) are dangerous to human health, do not work to prevent the spread of COVID, and can cause more harm than benefit.
The Board of Supervisors has a duty to the individuals who elected them to keep the face covering recommendation just that- a recommendation, and not mandatory, so as to not jeopardize the physical safety of its residents, as well as report its Health Officers for acts constituting moral turpitude to the State Medical Board.
In March Fauci Says Don’t Wear A Mask
Fauci: why the public wasn’t told to wear masks when the coronavirus pandemic began
“Masks are not 100 percent protective. However, they certainly are better than not wearing a mask. Both to prevent you, if you happen to be a person who maybe feels well, but has an asymptomatic infection that you don’t even know about, to prevent you from infecting someone else,”— Dr Anthony Fauci
Continue reading the article June 10th 2020
Do Masks Even Work?
What can you do if a store or employer is requiring you to wear a mask?
CDC MASK DECEPTION
DR. ANDREW KAUFMAN RESPONDS TO REUTERS FACT CHECK ON COVID-19 VACCINE GENETICALLY MODIFYING HUMANS
URGENT ALERT! OXYGEN – DEFICIENT – ATMOSPHERE!!
“There is no statistical evidence of a benefit in terms of reducing risk in getting a viral respiratory disease”conclusion of relevant studies on wearing masks
THERE WAS NO PLAGUE! MASKS DON’T WORK AND THEY ARE DANGEROUS TO THE GENERAL PUBLIC
As people turn against each other over mask mandates, many scientists are speaking out, including former professor of physics at the University of Ottawa, Denis Rancourt, PhD, who just released a paper compiling seven studies on the science surrounding the effectiveness or lack thereof of wearing masks. In a letter dated June 21 2020 OCLA has formally requested the World Health Organisation to retract its recommendation to decision makers of imposing masks for the general population.
There was no plague. However, a sharp “COVID peak” is present in the data, for several jurisdictions in Europe and the USA. This all-cause-mortality “COVID peak” has unique characteristics: • Its sharpness, with a full-width at half-maximum of only approximately 4 weeks; • Its lateness in the infectious-season cycle, surging after week-11 of 2020, which is unprecedented for any large sharp-peak feature; • The synchronicity of the onset of its surge, across continents, and immediately following the WHO declaration of the pandemic; and • Its USA state-to-state absence or presence for the same viral ecology on the same territory, being correlated with nursing home events and government actions rather than any known viral strain discernment. These “COVID peak” characteristics, and a review of the epidemiological history, and of relevant knowledge about viral respiratory diseases, lead me to postulate that the “COVID peak” results from an accelerated mass homicide of immune-vulnerable individuals, and individuals made more immune-vulnerable, by government and institutional actions, rather than being an epidemiological signature of a novel virus, irrespective of the degree to which the virus is novel from the perspective of viral speciation.— Dr. Denis Rancourt
UNMASKING THE LIES AROUND COVID-19 FACTS VS FICTION OF THE CORONAVIRUS PANDEMIC
When Science Cries Wolf
Instruments of… WHAT?!?
Gov. Mills’ Mask Mandate More Reasonable Than That Adopted by Society
The Face Masks People in Society are Forcing Each Other to Wear Offer No Protection Against Viral Transmission, But People Continue to Promote and Use Them, Anyway
The use of face masks by the public is a purely psychological measure intended to make people feel good and feel “safe.” But there is absolutely no protection from viruses or prevention of viral spread with the use of surgical or cloth face masks as scientific tests continually prove.
By: David Deschesne
September 9, 2020
While Maine Governor, Janet “Big Sister” Mills has mandated the use of face masks in public, despite a mountain of scientific proof showing they do not stop the spread of viral infection, her mandate is actually less restrictive and more reasonable than the rules society has arbitrarily made up for themselves after listening to the irrational hype and hysteria from the local and national television “news” propaganda machines which society then amplifies inside the mind-numbing social media echo chambers of Facebook and Twitter.
Her ridiculous, overbearing face masks for all public school students and staff aside, the Governor only mandates face masks in public settings when a person is unable to remain six feet away from another. She also does not require face masks for those with medical conditions or for children under two years of age. Children through young adult are the least likely age group to suffer from COVID-19, a disease which primarily affects 80+ year-old nursing home residents with multiple comorbidities.
The public, however, after feeding on months of television news hysteria, has adopted their own face mask mandate among themselves which arbitrarily expands Big Sister’s mandate to everyone wearing masks all the time, everywhere, even if they are the only person on the street, or in a car. Some parents are also placing those useless face masks on infants and children under two years of age
Everyone Needs To Hear What Fauci Said
NEW SCIENCE OUTLINES RISKS OF MASKING CHILDREN
ONE PISSED OFF DOCTOR – MASKS ARE KILLING YOU – TAKE THEM OFF NOW!
LACK OF OXYGEN AND CO2 PROBLEMS WHEN WEARING A MASK, INFECTION AND CANCER RISK, IGNORE MSM, RESEARCH
FIREFIGHTER HELPING US UNDERSTAND OXYGEN LEVELS UNDER A MASK
EXPERIMENT: Can You Breathe with a Double Mask?
Scientists Find Evidence Carcinogens And Other Toxic Chemicals In Face Masks
These toxic substances found on face masks also involve carcinogens, allergens and controlled substances.
Masks are used by general public these days mandated by governments in order to prevent Covid-19 infection.
However, experts are concerned that toxic chemicals in face masks can cause unintended health issues.
Before pandemic, China was the leading mask manufacturer of the world and solidified this position amid the outbreak of pandemic. It makes 85% of all masks.
Over 70,000 new companies registered to manufacture and sell face masks in China in 2020. High demand of masks lead concerns that masks are being made recklessly.
Preliminary analysis revealed that these masks are laced with toxic chemicals which are restricted for both environmental and health reasons.
These substances include formaldehyde that causes a burning sensation in eyes and nose, watery eyes, nausea, wheezing and coughing.
Director at the Hamburg Environmental Institute, Michael Braungart, conducted tests on masks that caused people to have rashes.
‘What we are breathing through our mouth and nose is actually hazardous waste,’ Professor Braungart said.
These used masks were found to contain formaldehyde and other chemicals.
Formaldehyde is the chemical which gives the ‘clean’ smell when a new pack of masks is opened. He also found aniline, a known carcinogen.
‘We found formaldehyde and even aniline and noticed that unknown artificial fragrances were being applied to cover any unpleasant chemical smells from the mask,” he said.
“In the case of the blue-coloured surgical masks, we found cobalt – which can be used as a blue dye.”
‘All in all, we have a chemical cocktail in front of our nose and mouth that has never been tested for either toxicity or any long-term effects on health,’ he said.
Dr Dieter Sedlak, managing director and co-founder of Modern Testing Services in Augsburg, also found formaldehyde, hazardous fluorocarbons (toxic) and other chemicals with his own unique testing method.
‘Honestly, I had not expected PFCs would be found in a surgical mask, but we have special routine methods in our labs to detect these chemicals easily and can immediately identify them. This is a big issue,’ said Dr Sedlak.
‘It seems this had been deliberately applied as a fluid repellent – it would work to repel the virus in an aerosol droplet format – but PFC on your face, on your nose, on the mucus membranes or on the eyes is not good.’
PFCs are used in textiles to add a coating in items like jackets and rucksacks and this protective coating is not intended to be inhaled.
‘Based on my practical experience there is certainly an elevated unreasonable risk,’ says Dr Sedlak.
Masks designed to be used by public are not categorized as PPE, so they are not subjected to meet the standards to design masks used by doctors.
Though, the accountability for ensuring masks meet the standards lies with the manufacturer and their local authorities.
But, these masks only have to meet general safety laws instead of having to meet medical grade standards and pass regular quality checks.
‘The General Product Safety Regulations 2005 (GPSR) sets out the responsibilities of the producers and distributors of these products,’ the UK government website states.
‘As face coverings are not medical devices, we do not regulate these products.’
Dr Julian Tang, a clinical virologist at the University of Leicester, repeated the sentiment of Professor Braungart and Dr Sedlak that more strong research is required.
‘Further studies on specific mask designs need to be performed if there is a perceived possible risk for any particular mask – and masks made by different manufacturers may not pose the same risks – if any exist,’ he said.
He says if people are concerned about their masks, one option is to use professional surgical masks which do have to meet stricter standards.
‘Southeast Asian countries have been using millions of surgical masks since the first SARS-COV-1 outbreaks in 2003 – with no reported ill effects,’ he adds.
‘But even before this, globally, surgical masks have been used in surgery by teams around the world – for decades – with no reported ill effects.’
Liz Cole, co-founder of the Us For Them organisation that advocates for children’s rights, says the findings are particularly concerning for youngsters.
‘Us for Them are concerned that the recommendations for children to wear face coverings in classrooms seems to be informed by no new scientific evidence nor does any harm assessment appear to have been conducted,’ she said.
‘Given the potential issues of child health and welfare at stake it is imperative that potential harms of face coverings in classrooms be considered and weighed against benefits’.
MAX IGAN PRELIMINARY MASK EXAMINATION
COVIDLAND: THE MASK TOTAL SCAM (EPISODE 2)
- The Healthy American – Masks Don’t Work
- Universal Masking in Hospitals in the Covid-19 Era | New England Journal of Medicine:
- All-cause mortality during COVID-19: No plague and a likely signature of mass homicide by government response
- Fauci: why the public wasn’t told to wear masks when the coronavirus pandemic began
- Californians Must Wear Face Mask In Public Under Coronavirus Order Issued By Newsom
- Gov. Mills’ Mask Mandate More Reasonable Than That Adopted by Society
- The Crowhouse
- Informed Consent Action Network (ICAN)
- The De-Program Network Brain
- Gov Docs Reveal Plan To ‘Alter Evolution’ With Nanotech & The Eugenics Element To COVID-19 Policy
- The Big Secret – Full Medical Documentary
- DEFENDING CHILDRENS RIGHTS – CHILDRENS HEALTH DEFENCE CANADA
- The Dirty War on the NHS
- BOOM! Trump’s DOJ criminally charges 76 doctors, 23 pharmacists, 19 nurses raking in billions in medical fraud to push toxic drugs – NaturalNews.com